Opinion: The Misuse of Rights in Viral Videos
By J. Taylor | Journalist | Springfield Daily Times
Lately, I’ve noticed a growing number of videos on YouTube that, in my opinion, lack maturity and purpose. Two genres that stand out are “First Amendment audit” videos and clips centered on alleged “constitutional rights violations.” As someone who values and depends on the First Amendment as part of my profession, I find these trends both frustrating and concerning.
Let me be clear—I deeply value the right to record in public spaces. It’s an essential tool for journalists and content creators alike. Much of what makes the news compelling is our ability to capture events as they unfold. But with that right comes responsibility. I believe strongly in courtesy and respect. Seeking viral fame by provoking confrontation isn't journalism—it’s performance.
First Amendment auditors often post up in front of banks, prisons, or refineries, aiming their cameras deliberately at sensitive locations, not for any journalistic purpose, but to bait law enforcement into an interaction. Their goal is not to inform, but to provoke. If no one reacted, if no one gave them the attention they crave, they’d be left filming nothing. And eventually, they’d likely move on.
At Springfield Daily Times, where I serve as both journalist and owner, this type of behavior is not, and never will be, acceptable. Our reporters are expected to follow a professional code of conduct. That includes informing businesses or organizations ahead of time when we plan to film, clearly identifying ourselves, stating our purpose, and always wearing our U.S. Press Association credentials. Respect and transparency are non-negotiable.
Another common trend I see involves traffic stop videos. The officer approaches and asks for a driver’s license and registration. Instead of cooperating, the individual often responds with, “What’s the reason for the stop?” and then escalates into a debate over rights and procedures.
Look, no one enjoys being pulled over. But in most cases, it’s wiser—and much less dramatic—to simply comply. Provide your documentation, listen to the explanation, and if you disagree, take your concerns to court. That’s where your case will be judged—based on evidence and due process—not on the side of the road.
I recognize that there are situations where law enforcement crosses the line. Rights matter. Accountability matters. But so does how we exercise those rights. Civil discourse, mutual respect, and a willingness to handle conflict through appropriate channels are also part of what makes a civil society.
Ultimately, just as others have the right to post these videos, I have the right to be disappointed by them. And I also have the right to model and advocate for professionalism in my own work and team.
This is just my take—an opinion sparked by a few too many frustrating scrolls through YouTube shorts. I welcome respectful thoughts and feedback in the comments.